Can you hardly wait til Pacificorp is SUED for hundreds of millions more over the Black Cap Project, when, down the road all the dirty deals, trade secrets, handshakes, and well I guess we will wait and see just who SUES Pacificorp next.
"SALT LAKE CITY (AP) A federal jury found PacifiCorp poached the unique design for a power plant and awarded a Texas bidder $134 million in damages.
Dallas-based USA Power Partners Ltd. says the utility copied its blueprints, called off bidding and did the construction itself.
The Salt Lake Tribune reports (http://bit.ly/LdxnVS ) that PacifiCorp plans to appeal Monday's verdict in U.S. District Court of Salt Lake City.
The Currant Creek power plant near Mona has a unique design that makes use of hot exhaust gases from a combustion turbine to produce steam that turns a second generator.
PacifiCorp built its plant a mile from where USA Power subsidiary Spring Canyon Energy says it obtained land and water rights for a power plant.
Spring Canyon Energy sued for theft of trade secrets and breach of contract.
___
Information from: The Salt Lake Tribune, http://www.sltrib.com"
Source of PacifiCorp Black Cap Project Post
http://www.krgv.com/news/pacificorp-hit-with-134-million-judgment
I believe that this HIT is costing the State of Oregon, as the Hand Outs in Oregon Land, Tax Breaks, Tax Credits and more deals surrounding Obsidian Finance Group and their many Solar Companies are what created the Black Cap Solar Project that Pacificorp has wattage contracts on for really big money and for many years into the future.
PacifiCorp seems to have stolen a valuable technology. Wonder if Tonkon Torp was in on any of this? Got a tip about the details of this story? Email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
Kevin D. Padrick is an Evil Snake, in my Opinion. Preying on victims in financial crisis and bullying companies and individuals into doing as he wishes so that he and Obsidian Finance Group can make Billions. The Lake County Solar Farms, as far as I see it are Government handouts to Millions like Kevin Padrick and David Brown of Obsidian Finance Group. The land was free or cheap, wasn't it? The solar tax credits were the assets to get loans on to build more and in the end the clients, customers of Pacificorp pay the price for all this high finance magic that used your tax dollars to make massive money for Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, David Brown through deals with Pacificorp. And this legal battle is most likely just the beginning of perpetual litigation now that Pacificorp is in bed with Kevin D. Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group.
I believe that Kevin Padrick is the king of stealing trade secrets and putting companies and individuals to ruin, and Tonkon Torp's David Aman helps him to do it. Just what I believe, in my opinion. Obviously you will want to READ and do your own due diligence.
Got a Tip?
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
MidAmerican : Pacific Power : Rocky Mountain Power
PacifiCorp (PPWLM)
Stock quote for PacifiCorp (PPW^)
If I had PacifiCorp stocks, I would be Paying Attention to deals with Obsidian Finance Group. Do your homework on this company, it is not about one blogger. Read the Facts for yourself. Find out just who Kevin D. Padrick really is.
PacifiCorp Chairman and CEO: Gregory E. Abel PacifiCorp Energy President and CEO: Micheal Dunn Pacific Power President and CEO: R. Patrick Reiten
Showing posts with label David Aman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Aman. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Black Cap Solar Project's Pacificorp Hit with Major Judgement. Looks like Pacificorp is in business with the Right Company in Oregon, Obsidian Finance Group. As it seems that Kevin Padrick is just as dirty as Pacificorp. Using other people's life's work to make millions on top of millions. The Black Cap Project, I believe was built from Tax Pay Money and handouts and the RICH get Richer and Sue you if you TELL on them. PacifiCorp (PPWLM). PacifiCorp Stock Quote.
Black Cap Solar Project's Pacificorp Hit with Major Judgement. Looks like Pacificorp is in business with the Right Company in Oregon, Obsidian Finance Group. As it seems that Kevin Padrick is just as dirty as Pacificorp. Using other people's life's work to make millions on top of millions. The Black Cap Project, I believe was built from Tax Pay Money and handouts and the RICH get Richer and Sue you if you TELL on them. PacifiCorp (PPWLM). PacifiCorp Stock Quote.
Can you hardly wait til Pacificorp is SUED for hundreds of millions more over the Black Cap Project, when, down the road all the dirty deals, trade secrets, handshakes, and well I guess we will wait and see just who SUES Pacificorp next.
"SALT LAKE CITY (AP) A federal jury found PacifiCorp poached the unique design for a power plant and awarded a Texas bidder $134 million in damages.
Dallas-based USA Power Partners Ltd. says the utility copied its blueprints, called off bidding and did the construction itself.
The Salt Lake Tribune reports (http://bit.ly/LdxnVS ) that PacifiCorp plans to appeal Monday's verdict in U.S. District Court of Salt Lake City.
The Currant Creek power plant near Mona has a unique design that makes use of hot exhaust gases from a combustion turbine to produce steam that turns a second generator.
PacifiCorp built its plant a mile from where USA Power subsidiary Spring Canyon Energy says it obtained land and water rights for a power plant.
Spring Canyon Energy sued for theft of trade secrets and breach of contract.
___
Information from: The Salt Lake Tribune, http://www.sltrib.com"
Source of PacifiCorp Black Cap Project Post
http://www.krgv.com/news/pacificorp-hit-with-134-million-judgment
I believe that this HIT is costing the State of Oregon, as the Hand Outs in Oregon Land, Tax Breaks, Tax Credits and more deals surrounding Obsidian Finance Group and their many Solar Companies are what created the Black Cap Solar Project that Pacificorp has wattage contracts on for really big money and for many years into the future.
PacifiCorp seems to have stolen a valuable technology. Wonder if Tonkon Torp was in on any of this? Got a tip about the details of this story? Email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
Kevin D. Padrick is an Evil Snake, in my Opinion. Preying on victims in financial crisis and bullying companies and individuals into doing as he wishes so that he and Obsidian Finance Group can make Billions. The Lake County Solar Farms, as far as I see it are Government handouts to Millions like Kevin Padrick and David Brown of Obsidian Finance Group. The land was free or cheap, wasn't it? The solar tax credits were the assets to get loans on to build more and in the end the clients, customers of Pacificorp pay the price for all this high finance magic that used your tax dollars to make massive money for Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, David Brown through deals with Pacificorp. And this legal battle is most likely just the beginning of perpetual litigation now that Pacificorp is in bed with Kevin D. Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group.
I believe that Kevin Padrick is the king of stealing trade secrets and putting companies and individuals to ruin, and Tonkon Torp's David Aman helps him to do it. Just what I believe, in my opinion. Obviously you will want to READ and do your own due diligence.
Got a Tip?
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
MidAmerican : Pacific Power : Rocky Mountain Power
PacifiCorp (PPWLM)
Stock quote for PacifiCorp (PPW^)
If I had PacifiCorp stocks, I would be Paying Attention to deals with Obsidian Finance Group. Do your homework on this company, it is not about one blogger. Read the Facts for yourself. Find out just who Kevin D. Padrick really is.
PacifiCorp Chairman and CEO: Gregory E. Abel PacifiCorp Energy President and CEO: Micheal Dunn Pacific Power President and CEO: R. Patrick Reiten
"SALT LAKE CITY (AP) A federal jury found PacifiCorp poached the unique design for a power plant and awarded a Texas bidder $134 million in damages.
Dallas-based USA Power Partners Ltd. says the utility copied its blueprints, called off bidding and did the construction itself.
The Salt Lake Tribune reports (http://bit.ly/LdxnVS ) that PacifiCorp plans to appeal Monday's verdict in U.S. District Court of Salt Lake City.
The Currant Creek power plant near Mona has a unique design that makes use of hot exhaust gases from a combustion turbine to produce steam that turns a second generator.
PacifiCorp built its plant a mile from where USA Power subsidiary Spring Canyon Energy says it obtained land and water rights for a power plant.
Spring Canyon Energy sued for theft of trade secrets and breach of contract.
___
Information from: The Salt Lake Tribune, http://www.sltrib.com"
Source of PacifiCorp Black Cap Project Post
http://www.krgv.com/news/pacificorp-hit-with-134-million-judgment
I believe that this HIT is costing the State of Oregon, as the Hand Outs in Oregon Land, Tax Breaks, Tax Credits and more deals surrounding Obsidian Finance Group and their many Solar Companies are what created the Black Cap Solar Project that Pacificorp has wattage contracts on for really big money and for many years into the future.
PacifiCorp seems to have stolen a valuable technology. Wonder if Tonkon Torp was in on any of this? Got a tip about the details of this story? Email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
Kevin D. Padrick is an Evil Snake, in my Opinion. Preying on victims in financial crisis and bullying companies and individuals into doing as he wishes so that he and Obsidian Finance Group can make Billions. The Lake County Solar Farms, as far as I see it are Government handouts to Millions like Kevin Padrick and David Brown of Obsidian Finance Group. The land was free or cheap, wasn't it? The solar tax credits were the assets to get loans on to build more and in the end the clients, customers of Pacificorp pay the price for all this high finance magic that used your tax dollars to make massive money for Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, David Brown through deals with Pacificorp. And this legal battle is most likely just the beginning of perpetual litigation now that Pacificorp is in bed with Kevin D. Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group.
I believe that Kevin Padrick is the king of stealing trade secrets and putting companies and individuals to ruin, and Tonkon Torp's David Aman helps him to do it. Just what I believe, in my opinion. Obviously you will want to READ and do your own due diligence.
Got a Tip?
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
MidAmerican : Pacific Power : Rocky Mountain Power
PacifiCorp (PPWLM)
Stock quote for PacifiCorp (PPW^)
If I had PacifiCorp stocks, I would be Paying Attention to deals with Obsidian Finance Group. Do your homework on this company, it is not about one blogger. Read the Facts for yourself. Find out just who Kevin D. Padrick really is.
PacifiCorp Chairman and CEO: Gregory E. Abel PacifiCorp Energy President and CEO: Micheal Dunn Pacific Power President and CEO: R. Patrick Reiten
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, Press Release on what she believes happened in the Summit Bankruptcy Part One
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/110162783/Kevin-Padrick-Summit-Bankruptcy-Questions-by-Crystal-L-Cox-Blogger
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger Questions Kevin Padrick's Role as Bankruptcy Trustee
"Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox has Questions for the Bankruptcy Courts, the
Department of Justice, and the Attorney General Regarding the Actions of Kevin
Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group in his role as a “Trustee” in a Federal Bankruptcy
Proceeding."
In the Summit 1031 / Summit Accomodators Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon
that involved creditors, investors, victims from many states, there are many questions
that investigative blogger Crystal Cox has regarding Kevin Padrick, the Bankruptcy
Trustee, whom was under contract with the Debtor (Summit) to Reorganize their Debt,
Before the Debtor filed for Bankruptcy in the Summit Bankruptcy, then Kevin Padrick
was later appointed Trustee, which was essentially on the opposite side of the best
interest of his own client.
In the Summit Bankruptcy there were conflicts of interest with the Creditors Attorney, Perkins
Coie, Steven Hedberg as he us to work under Kevin Padrick while they were both at Miller
Nash Law Firm. And there were conflicts with Pamela Griffith, Assistant US Trustee having
past connections with Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp. Tonkon Torp David Aman and Leon
Simson have a lot to gain, or keep in aiding to silence blogger Crystal Cox on the Real Story
of the Summit Bankruptcy and the seemingly endless amounts of high finance connections
that led to a 40 Million dollar bankruptcy being under the control of one man, Kevin Padrick.
Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogging has been writing on the Summit Bankruptcy for 3 years
now. Crystal Cox has deeply researched the issues in this bankruptcy and has since been
exposed to inside information on the biggest bankruptcy cases in the US and the same
Model of Corruption that seems to be involved in most all bankruptcy cases.
Whereby the courts, the trustee, uses up the money and the Debtors take the fall for it and the Public
Persecution and the investors and creditors are at the mercy of the Trustee, the Courts as
they attorneys suck up millions in fees with no transparency or accountability.
Crystal Cox began writing on the Summit Bankruptcy Case in July of 2009, after she
extensively read documents, depositions, LLC management files, tax documents and
watched videos of meeting with the Debtors and their Financial Consultant Obsidian Finance
Group, Kevin Padrick. Of which she found links to these documents and this massive
information and videos at a blog that a Bankruptcy Whistleblower had exposing the inside
details of a $40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy.
This woman and other insiders, investors, creditors filed an Objection to the Fees against Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group and David Aman, Tonkon Torp as they charged the estate millions of dollars and with seemingly no accountability what so ever.
This Judicial Procedure, of Public Record is where Crystal Cox, Blogger got most of the
information for the post she was sued for 10 Million Dollars on by those wishing to silence
her. This information was not allowed to be introduce into evidence.
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox has Some Questions for the FBI, the Department of Justice and
anyone out there who actually provides any kind of Monitoring of the Bankruptcy Courts or in any way
Enforces the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger asks, Can a Department of Justice, Court Appointed Trustee be a Legally
Defined Insider? Was Kevin Padrick an “Insider” just because he was paid by the debtor to help them
reorganize debt and then took their books, spreadsheets and inside information and used it against them as the
bankruptcy trustee?
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger asks why did Judge Randall Dunn suggest that Kevin Padrick be the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy? Certainly Judge Randall Dunn, the Bankruptcy Judge in Summit Bankruptcy case, knew that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was under contract with Obsidian to Advise them - there were press releases from Sussman Shank’s Attorney Susan Ford, the Attorney for the Debtor that discussed Obsidian being on board, the attorneys of the Principals knew that "Obsidian" was on board as you see in the transcription of the meeting BEFORE Kevin Padrick showed up to that Summit Meeting.
Is Judge Randall Dunn Liable ? Does Judge Dunn have any accountability?
Was Judge Randall Dunn Paid Off or got some secret deal for making Kevin Padrick the Trustee in what is said to be Oregon’s Biggest Bankruptcy Case at that time? Will the Oregon Tax Payers end up paying a huge settlement when possibly the Summit Creditors Sue Judge Randall Dunn Personally and Professionally?
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger fully believe that the Summit Creditor, Investors and Even Summit Principals can file a class action lawsuit against Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, David Brown, Pamela Griffith and the Department of Justice, Judge Randal Dunn, the Bend DA Office, Perkins Coie, Sussman Shank, Susan Ford, Steven Hedberg, Annie Buell, the Tennant Family, Tonkon Torp, David Aman and Leon Simpson ~ As she believe they all acted in conspiracy to get Kevin Padrick the Trustee job and to divert the DOJ and FBI to focus on the Summit Principals while Kevin Padrick ran away with everyone's money.
Why did a Federal Bankruptcy Judge appoint what looks like a legally defined "Insider" as a Trustee" ?
Was Kevin Padrick an "Insider" an "Interested" party by law, and therefore NOT Legally Qualified to be the
Trustee of the Summit Bankruptcy? If so is all the actions of Kevin Padrick as Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy Null and Void?
Did the Department of Justice Trustee, Judge Randall Dunn, Steven Hedberg of Perkins Coie and Tom Stilley
of Sussman Shank, as well as Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp act in conspiracy to get Kevin Padrick this very
lucrative Trustee job? And if so, well then where was the real "Oversight" to provide any kind of transparency
and accountability for the Investors and Creditors?
Where was the Department Of Justice in making sure that Kevin Padrick was providing a service that was of
the "Highest Fiduciary Duty"?
The actions of the DOJ, the Bankruptcy Judge, the Attorneys for the Creditor and the Debtors makes no legal or ethical sense and is certainly not of the highest fiduciary duty, says blogger Crystal Cox. Crystal Cox says,in her opinion, that Judge Randall Dunn has some serious Explaining to do and possibly some Lawsuits of his own to face.
In looking at Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(31) it sure seems to be suggesting that,as a legally
defined Insider, under contract to advise the Debtor, that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was not
legally allowed to be "appointed" as the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy, Not sure if this is Fact, However, if you dig deep, surely you would, at least have some questions in all this.
Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(31)
"(14) The term "disinterested person" means a person that--
(A) is not a creditor, an equity security holder, or an insider;
(B) is not and was not, within 2 years before the date of the filing of the petition, a director, officer, or
employee of the debtor; and
(C) does not have an interest materially adverse to the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or
equity security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the
debtor, or for any other reason.
Above Quoted from
http://doney.net/bkcode/11usc0101.htm
One thing that jumps out at blogger Crystal Cox is, property must be transferred to a "disinterested party"
right? And as above in the bankruptcy code we note the definition of "disinterested party" NOT an Insider,
and Kevin Padrick was an "Insider" from the way she sees it.
Wasn't Kevin Padrick in "control" of the "debtor" and thereby again an insider?
He seemed to have advised them on all this BEFORE he was the Trustee working against them, is this Legal?
Really? It certainly must be unethically for an Oregon Attorney to provide financial advice to a company, take
their personal financial data and use it against them. It must be a "breach of contract" at the very least, right?
As Kevin Padrick was under contract with Summit, though the Trial (Obsidian V. Cox) Defendant, Blogger Crystal Cox asked Kevin Padrick if he had a contract with Summit and he said he did not, of which others at Obsidian Finance Group, on the stand, later admitted they did have a signed contract, and took $100,000 of Summit's money.
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group was under contract to assist Summit to form a plan of reorganization and instead drove them further into problems, and took a workable situation financially and basically drowned his own clients ensuring they file bankruptcy and could not reorganize and therefore Kevin Padrick would get massive commissions on each asset SOLD and get HUGE fees for services with No Oversight, Transparency or Accountability.
Stephanie DeYoung, Mark Knowles, Jim Hull filed an Objection to these Outrageous Fees, and serial Plaintiff
Kevin Padrick put them under so much duress they gave up, and though not based in law or bankruptcy code, Kevin Padrick, with his attorney David Aman ... well he got his way.
The Objection went away, yet Kevin Padrick was called out again over similar issues in the Summer of 2011,
in the Homestreet / Cascadia Project LLC legal battle where Homestreet bank objected to Kevin Padrick's fees and conflicts of interest. Homestreet WON, where bankruptcy whistleblower and mother of 3 Stephanie DeYoung was forced to stand down, though their Objection to the Fees was thorough, truthful and was a legitimate objection.
See Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group had the debtors books, had spreadsheets on the Debtors Assets and Personal Financial Information and WAS an Insider, it seems to Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.
Therefore, In her Opinion, He had NO BUSINESS working for the Creditors in this Case nor being appointed as the Trustee, in my Opinion and the way I see the Laws, from my Non-Lawyer interpretation.
the Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(31) ("insiders" include an 6 "officer","person in control of the debtor", "affiliate, or insider of an affiliate as if such affiliate were the debtor", and "managing agent of the debtor").
Bankruptcy Code on Duties of Trustee and Examiner
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_11_00001106----000-.html
This talks about investigations into debtors debt, see Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group already had this information in Great Detail, as he was an Insider, under contract, under "control" of the Debtors, yet he became Trustee and SEEMED to charge the estate to investigate what he was already paid to look into by the Summit Principals, his Client. And he had no Oversight, the DOJ Trustee just let Kevin Padrick do as he pleased and answer to no one.
This is for the Courts to Decide and to Look at But Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger Certainly Does Raise the Question:
Can a Legally Defined "Insider", Under Contract with the Debtor, before they filed bankruptcy
be Appointed as a Trustee in a 40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy Case?
Also Note that Sussman Shank, Attorney for the Summit Principals did not object and seemed in fact to agree with Judge Dunn in appointing Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance when it looks like days before THIS SAME Attorney, Sussman Shank's Lead Attorney Susan Ford said in an email to Steven Hedberg of Perkins Coie (Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee who at one time worked under Kevin Padrick at Miller Nash), to Tom Stilley (Assistant Attorney for Sussman and Shank), to Jeanette Thomas ( Perkins Coie Attorney for Creditors' Committee), and to Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group that """There was significant concern that such a proposal would be "dead on arrival" and might even lead to a Motion by the UST to appoint a Trustee, which would not benefit the creditors.""
So what happened, who is liable, where is the highest fiduciary duty ?
They ALL, surely seemed to know that Kevin Padrick Was Legally Defined in Bankruptcy Code as an Insider and yet they all looked the other way, why? And if it is not illegal then certainly Kevin Padrick should be filed against with the Oregon State Bar as an Ethics Violation, at the least, Right?
The Summit case involves victims (Creditors and Investors) in multiple states, who is really liable?
Accountable? I would say to start with, the Victims need to sue the Department of Justice and those personally involved in the oversight duties of the Summit Bankruptcy in which Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was allegedly to answer to.
Also think about this, as thought to consider, it is Tax Code, in a 1031 Exchange that Property, such as the Assets and LLC's involved in the Summit Bankruptcy that this be transferred to a "Disinterested Party" which it SEEMS that by Law Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group Was not. So is this a Violation of Tax Code regarding 1031 Exchanges?
Did Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group retain a "Qualified Intermediary" for the 1031 Exchange Transactions, seeings how it seems to me that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was NOT a "disinterested party" as I believe the law states that an intermediary must be ???
Does David Aman, Tonkon Torp know of this possible illegal activity and is therefore bullying, harassing an Investigative Blogger in order to hide what looks like something that David Aman, Leon Simson and Tonkon Torp knew since the begining of the Summit Bankruptcy.
And if an attorney knows of a possible crime, are they not by law or by attorney ethics bound to report this suspected behavior for investigation by the Proper Authorities? Also note that it sure seems that Leon Simson and David Aman are more then conflicted in the Summit case and are liable for some possible criminal activity of their own.
Did Kevin Patrick's past connection with Miller Nash and Working with Steve Hedberg there present a Legal Conflict of Interest in the Summit Bankruptc as Kevin Padrick being appointed by Judge Dunn to be the Trustee? Why did Sussman Shank agree to this appointment, when days before Lead Attorney Susan Ford of Sussman Shank flat out said that this was not in the best interest of the Creditors?
Why did Kevin Padrick bill the Summit Creditors for a meeting with Steve Hedberg, Perkins Coie (Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee who at one time worked under Kevin Padrick at Miller Nash), and Tom Stilley (Assistant Attorney for Sussman and Shank) to discuss replacing Terry Vance as CRO? This can be seen discussed in Judicial Proceeding Case No. 08-37031 rld11 in Billable Hours.
Terry Vance was doing a fine job, from all I have read and Susan Ford Lead Attorney with Sussman Shank was allegedly out of town when Tom Stilley, Sussman Shank was involved in this. So, was Tom Stilley Connected in any Conflict of Interest Ways?
Why did Sussman Shank agree, knowing full well that Kevin Padrick was Legally Defined as an Insider by way of Contract with the Summit Principals to work for them?
Didn't Susan Ford, Sussman Shank talk about Obsidian being "retained" in this Press Release
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/summitwebsiteannouncement.pdf
Therefore Susan Ford of Sussman Shank knew full well that in Bankruptcy Code Kevin Padrick was Defined Legally as an Insider.
So why did Sussman Shank NOT object to Judge Randall Dunn appointing Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group as the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy ?
Why did the courts appoint a trustee based on an
oral motion without any prior notice to parties in interest?
Why was an individual, Kevin Padrick appointed as a United States Trustee?
Certainly all these questions are of Public Concern?
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, seems to be a seriously conflicted Bankruptcy Trustee as he was an insider, legally defined, Crystal Cox, investigative blogger believes, and had conflicts of interest with the Creditors' Committee Attorney Steven Hedberg and Seemingly with Sussman Shank.
Kevin Padrick was under contract with the Debtor to give them financial advice, as noted in the Sussman Shank, Susan Ford Press Release, which makes him an "insider" right legally? This makes him NOT a "disinterested party" RIGHT?
Then, after this, he was "appointed" as Trustee by a Federal Bankruptcy Judge, Judge Randall Dunn, after Sussman Shank Attorney Susan Ford Advised that this is NOT in the Best Interest of the Creditors, Judge Randall Dunn Suggested the Kevin Padrick be appointed as the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy and Sussman Shank made no objection to this, what seemsto be a serious conflict of interest, Why?
Also note that Tonkon Torp was making Tons of money and as this quote says "Kevin knew he could get Leon Simson on board and therefore, possibly Pamela Griffith."
Source of Quote -
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=1628
~ Pamela Griffith is the Department of Justice U.S. Trustee that was supposed to watch over the actions of the Trustee (Kevin Padrick) and in my opinion she was conflicted as she used to work with Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Tonkon Torp Leon Simson and Tonkon Torp David Aman stood to make a whole lot of money from Kevin Padrick being the Trustee in the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy.
Lot's Of Questions and Seemingly No One in a Position of Authority to Ask them To.
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger believe that the law states that as someone with knowledge of a crime, or possible crime, you can file a Criminal Complaint, and Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger intends to file Judicial Complaints, Attorney Complaints, Department of Justice Complaints, and a Federal RICO Lawsuit over the actions of Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group in the Summit Bankruptcy Case.
And as those cases are filed, Blogger Crystal Cox will post them on her Investigative Blogger Network and expose all the government agencies that once again ignore corruption in the US Bankruptcy Courts and aid and abet the corruption in the US Courts by refusing to investigate what whistle blowers tell them.
It’s Time for Accountability and Transparency in the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts.
The Debtors Financial Adviser becomes the Trustee working against the Debtor?
Does No One See an Issue with this???
And this Man, Kevin Padrick has a History of taking advantage of his own clients
and is seemingly accountable to no one.
In the news articles on the Summit Indictments you see this quote, “We will vigorously
investigate and prosecute anyone, especially licensed professionals, who cheat others to
enrich themselves,” said U.S. Attorney Holton.”
The thing is the Oregon Governor, the Attorney General, the SEC, the FBI, and all who govern white collar crimes and the US Bankruptcy Courts, they all seem to flat out ignore the activities of the Judges, Attorneys, DOJ Trustee and Bankruptcy Trustee after the money is turned over to the US Bankruptcy system and pilfered by the insiders, as the Creditors, Investors, Victims are at the mercy of the Bankruptcy Judge and the Trustee of which there is no real oversight and absolutely no transparency or accountability for their actions, their outrageous fees and their behind the scenes back scratching and favors owed, all at the expense of those with their whole lives wrapped up in the outcome of the bankruptcy.
This Summit case was allegedly being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Investigation Division of the Internal Revenue Service, the United States Postal Inspectors, and the Oregon Division of Finance and Corporate Securities. Assistant U.S. Attorney Seth Uram and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Helen Cooper, as part of a partnership venture between the Seattle Region, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney’s Office in Portland, Oregon.
The thing is they all turned a blind eye to inside documents and proof as to what the Trustee was doing, and to this day have simply pointed the finger at the Debtor and have not even questioned where the money went after Obsidian Finance Group stepped onto the Scene, which was BEFORE the Debtor Filed for Bankruptcy.
The Summit Bankruptcy was riddled with conflicts of interest. The Summit Bankruptcy and all
activities involving anything that Kevin Padrick did as the Trustee, should be null and void.
The Summit Indictments should be re-investigated as one man used powerful connections to ensure those indictment and to keep the eyes off him while he raked in million upon millions, and future favors galore, Kevin Padrick Bankruptcy Trustee did NOT offer the “Highest Fiduciary Duty” Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox is dedicated to exposing Kevin Padrick and Obsidian
Finance Group, as she believe they have created a trail of victims, of which she believes she
fights for by using the power of Internet marketing to get top search engine placement and
get these victims, these creditors and investors that are at the mercy of a corrupt and nontransparent
bankruptcy court system, found in the search engines in hopes of getting them justice and providing transparency and accountability where there is none.
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger Questions Kevin Padrick's Role as Bankruptcy Trustee
"Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox has Questions for the Bankruptcy Courts, the
Department of Justice, and the Attorney General Regarding the Actions of Kevin
Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group in his role as a “Trustee” in a Federal Bankruptcy
Proceeding."
In the Summit 1031 / Summit Accomodators Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon
that involved creditors, investors, victims from many states, there are many questions
that investigative blogger Crystal Cox has regarding Kevin Padrick, the Bankruptcy
Trustee, whom was under contract with the Debtor (Summit) to Reorganize their Debt,
Before the Debtor filed for Bankruptcy in the Summit Bankruptcy, then Kevin Padrick
was later appointed Trustee, which was essentially on the opposite side of the best
interest of his own client.
In the Summit Bankruptcy there were conflicts of interest with the Creditors Attorney, Perkins
Coie, Steven Hedberg as he us to work under Kevin Padrick while they were both at Miller
Nash Law Firm. And there were conflicts with Pamela Griffith, Assistant US Trustee having
past connections with Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp. Tonkon Torp David Aman and Leon
Simson have a lot to gain, or keep in aiding to silence blogger Crystal Cox on the Real Story
of the Summit Bankruptcy and the seemingly endless amounts of high finance connections
that led to a 40 Million dollar bankruptcy being under the control of one man, Kevin Padrick.
Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogging has been writing on the Summit Bankruptcy for 3 years
now. Crystal Cox has deeply researched the issues in this bankruptcy and has since been
exposed to inside information on the biggest bankruptcy cases in the US and the same
Model of Corruption that seems to be involved in most all bankruptcy cases.
Whereby the courts, the trustee, uses up the money and the Debtors take the fall for it and the Public
Persecution and the investors and creditors are at the mercy of the Trustee, the Courts as
they attorneys suck up millions in fees with no transparency or accountability.
Crystal Cox began writing on the Summit Bankruptcy Case in July of 2009, after she
extensively read documents, depositions, LLC management files, tax documents and
watched videos of meeting with the Debtors and their Financial Consultant Obsidian Finance
Group, Kevin Padrick. Of which she found links to these documents and this massive
information and videos at a blog that a Bankruptcy Whistleblower had exposing the inside
details of a $40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy.
This woman and other insiders, investors, creditors filed an Objection to the Fees against Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group and David Aman, Tonkon Torp as they charged the estate millions of dollars and with seemingly no accountability what so ever.
This Judicial Procedure, of Public Record is where Crystal Cox, Blogger got most of the
information for the post she was sued for 10 Million Dollars on by those wishing to silence
her. This information was not allowed to be introduce into evidence.
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox has Some Questions for the FBI, the Department of Justice and
anyone out there who actually provides any kind of Monitoring of the Bankruptcy Courts or in any way
Enforces the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger asks, Can a Department of Justice, Court Appointed Trustee be a Legally
Defined Insider? Was Kevin Padrick an “Insider” just because he was paid by the debtor to help them
reorganize debt and then took their books, spreadsheets and inside information and used it against them as the
bankruptcy trustee?
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger asks why did Judge Randall Dunn suggest that Kevin Padrick be the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy? Certainly Judge Randall Dunn, the Bankruptcy Judge in Summit Bankruptcy case, knew that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was under contract with Obsidian to Advise them - there were press releases from Sussman Shank’s Attorney Susan Ford, the Attorney for the Debtor that discussed Obsidian being on board, the attorneys of the Principals knew that "Obsidian" was on board as you see in the transcription of the meeting BEFORE Kevin Padrick showed up to that Summit Meeting.
Is Judge Randall Dunn Liable ? Does Judge Dunn have any accountability?
Was Judge Randall Dunn Paid Off or got some secret deal for making Kevin Padrick the Trustee in what is said to be Oregon’s Biggest Bankruptcy Case at that time? Will the Oregon Tax Payers end up paying a huge settlement when possibly the Summit Creditors Sue Judge Randall Dunn Personally and Professionally?
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger fully believe that the Summit Creditor, Investors and Even Summit Principals can file a class action lawsuit against Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, David Brown, Pamela Griffith and the Department of Justice, Judge Randal Dunn, the Bend DA Office, Perkins Coie, Sussman Shank, Susan Ford, Steven Hedberg, Annie Buell, the Tennant Family, Tonkon Torp, David Aman and Leon Simpson ~ As she believe they all acted in conspiracy to get Kevin Padrick the Trustee job and to divert the DOJ and FBI to focus on the Summit Principals while Kevin Padrick ran away with everyone's money.
Why did a Federal Bankruptcy Judge appoint what looks like a legally defined "Insider" as a Trustee" ?
Was Kevin Padrick an "Insider" an "Interested" party by law, and therefore NOT Legally Qualified to be the
Trustee of the Summit Bankruptcy? If so is all the actions of Kevin Padrick as Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy Null and Void?
Did the Department of Justice Trustee, Judge Randall Dunn, Steven Hedberg of Perkins Coie and Tom Stilley
of Sussman Shank, as well as Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp act in conspiracy to get Kevin Padrick this very
lucrative Trustee job? And if so, well then where was the real "Oversight" to provide any kind of transparency
and accountability for the Investors and Creditors?
Where was the Department Of Justice in making sure that Kevin Padrick was providing a service that was of
the "Highest Fiduciary Duty"?
The actions of the DOJ, the Bankruptcy Judge, the Attorneys for the Creditor and the Debtors makes no legal or ethical sense and is certainly not of the highest fiduciary duty, says blogger Crystal Cox. Crystal Cox says,in her opinion, that Judge Randall Dunn has some serious Explaining to do and possibly some Lawsuits of his own to face.
In looking at Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(31) it sure seems to be suggesting that,as a legally
defined Insider, under contract to advise the Debtor, that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was not
legally allowed to be "appointed" as the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy, Not sure if this is Fact, However, if you dig deep, surely you would, at least have some questions in all this.
Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(31)
"(14) The term "disinterested person" means a person that--
(A) is not a creditor, an equity security holder, or an insider;
(B) is not and was not, within 2 years before the date of the filing of the petition, a director, officer, or
employee of the debtor; and
(C) does not have an interest materially adverse to the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or
equity security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the
debtor, or for any other reason.
Above Quoted from
http://doney.net/bkcode/11usc0101.htm
One thing that jumps out at blogger Crystal Cox is, property must be transferred to a "disinterested party"
right? And as above in the bankruptcy code we note the definition of "disinterested party" NOT an Insider,
and Kevin Padrick was an "Insider" from the way she sees it.
Wasn't Kevin Padrick in "control" of the "debtor" and thereby again an insider?
He seemed to have advised them on all this BEFORE he was the Trustee working against them, is this Legal?
Really? It certainly must be unethically for an Oregon Attorney to provide financial advice to a company, take
their personal financial data and use it against them. It must be a "breach of contract" at the very least, right?
As Kevin Padrick was under contract with Summit, though the Trial (Obsidian V. Cox) Defendant, Blogger Crystal Cox asked Kevin Padrick if he had a contract with Summit and he said he did not, of which others at Obsidian Finance Group, on the stand, later admitted they did have a signed contract, and took $100,000 of Summit's money.
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group was under contract to assist Summit to form a plan of reorganization and instead drove them further into problems, and took a workable situation financially and basically drowned his own clients ensuring they file bankruptcy and could not reorganize and therefore Kevin Padrick would get massive commissions on each asset SOLD and get HUGE fees for services with No Oversight, Transparency or Accountability.
Stephanie DeYoung, Mark Knowles, Jim Hull filed an Objection to these Outrageous Fees, and serial Plaintiff
Kevin Padrick put them under so much duress they gave up, and though not based in law or bankruptcy code, Kevin Padrick, with his attorney David Aman ... well he got his way.
The Objection went away, yet Kevin Padrick was called out again over similar issues in the Summer of 2011,
in the Homestreet / Cascadia Project LLC legal battle where Homestreet bank objected to Kevin Padrick's fees and conflicts of interest. Homestreet WON, where bankruptcy whistleblower and mother of 3 Stephanie DeYoung was forced to stand down, though their Objection to the Fees was thorough, truthful and was a legitimate objection.
See Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group had the debtors books, had spreadsheets on the Debtors Assets and Personal Financial Information and WAS an Insider, it seems to Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.
Therefore, In her Opinion, He had NO BUSINESS working for the Creditors in this Case nor being appointed as the Trustee, in my Opinion and the way I see the Laws, from my Non-Lawyer interpretation.
the Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(31) ("insiders" include an 6 "officer","person in control of the debtor", "affiliate, or insider of an affiliate as if such affiliate were the debtor", and "managing agent of the debtor").
Bankruptcy Code on Duties of Trustee and Examiner
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_11_00001106----000-.html
This talks about investigations into debtors debt, see Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group already had this information in Great Detail, as he was an Insider, under contract, under "control" of the Debtors, yet he became Trustee and SEEMED to charge the estate to investigate what he was already paid to look into by the Summit Principals, his Client. And he had no Oversight, the DOJ Trustee just let Kevin Padrick do as he pleased and answer to no one.
This is for the Courts to Decide and to Look at But Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger Certainly Does Raise the Question:
Can a Legally Defined "Insider", Under Contract with the Debtor, before they filed bankruptcy
be Appointed as a Trustee in a 40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy Case?
Also Note that Sussman Shank, Attorney for the Summit Principals did not object and seemed in fact to agree with Judge Dunn in appointing Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance when it looks like days before THIS SAME Attorney, Sussman Shank's Lead Attorney Susan Ford said in an email to Steven Hedberg of Perkins Coie (Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee who at one time worked under Kevin Padrick at Miller Nash), to Tom Stilley (Assistant Attorney for Sussman and Shank), to Jeanette Thomas ( Perkins Coie Attorney for Creditors' Committee), and to Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group that """There was significant concern that such a proposal would be "dead on arrival" and might even lead to a Motion by the UST to appoint a Trustee, which would not benefit the creditors.""
So what happened, who is liable, where is the highest fiduciary duty ?
They ALL, surely seemed to know that Kevin Padrick Was Legally Defined in Bankruptcy Code as an Insider and yet they all looked the other way, why? And if it is not illegal then certainly Kevin Padrick should be filed against with the Oregon State Bar as an Ethics Violation, at the least, Right?
The Summit case involves victims (Creditors and Investors) in multiple states, who is really liable?
Accountable? I would say to start with, the Victims need to sue the Department of Justice and those personally involved in the oversight duties of the Summit Bankruptcy in which Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was allegedly to answer to.
Also think about this, as thought to consider, it is Tax Code, in a 1031 Exchange that Property, such as the Assets and LLC's involved in the Summit Bankruptcy that this be transferred to a "Disinterested Party" which it SEEMS that by Law Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group Was not. So is this a Violation of Tax Code regarding 1031 Exchanges?
Did Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group retain a "Qualified Intermediary" for the 1031 Exchange Transactions, seeings how it seems to me that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was NOT a "disinterested party" as I believe the law states that an intermediary must be ???
Does David Aman, Tonkon Torp know of this possible illegal activity and is therefore bullying, harassing an Investigative Blogger in order to hide what looks like something that David Aman, Leon Simson and Tonkon Torp knew since the begining of the Summit Bankruptcy.
And if an attorney knows of a possible crime, are they not by law or by attorney ethics bound to report this suspected behavior for investigation by the Proper Authorities? Also note that it sure seems that Leon Simson and David Aman are more then conflicted in the Summit case and are liable for some possible criminal activity of their own.
Did Kevin Patrick's past connection with Miller Nash and Working with Steve Hedberg there present a Legal Conflict of Interest in the Summit Bankruptc as Kevin Padrick being appointed by Judge Dunn to be the Trustee? Why did Sussman Shank agree to this appointment, when days before Lead Attorney Susan Ford of Sussman Shank flat out said that this was not in the best interest of the Creditors?
Why did Kevin Padrick bill the Summit Creditors for a meeting with Steve Hedberg, Perkins Coie (Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee who at one time worked under Kevin Padrick at Miller Nash), and Tom Stilley (Assistant Attorney for Sussman and Shank) to discuss replacing Terry Vance as CRO? This can be seen discussed in Judicial Proceeding Case No. 08-37031 rld11 in Billable Hours.
Terry Vance was doing a fine job, from all I have read and Susan Ford Lead Attorney with Sussman Shank was allegedly out of town when Tom Stilley, Sussman Shank was involved in this. So, was Tom Stilley Connected in any Conflict of Interest Ways?
Why did Sussman Shank agree, knowing full well that Kevin Padrick was Legally Defined as an Insider by way of Contract with the Summit Principals to work for them?
Didn't Susan Ford, Sussman Shank talk about Obsidian being "retained" in this Press Release
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/summitwebsiteannouncement.pdf
Therefore Susan Ford of Sussman Shank knew full well that in Bankruptcy Code Kevin Padrick was Defined Legally as an Insider.
So why did Sussman Shank NOT object to Judge Randall Dunn appointing Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group as the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy ?
Why did the courts appoint a trustee based on an
oral motion without any prior notice to parties in interest?
Why was an individual, Kevin Padrick appointed as a United States Trustee?
Certainly all these questions are of Public Concern?
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, seems to be a seriously conflicted Bankruptcy Trustee as he was an insider, legally defined, Crystal Cox, investigative blogger believes, and had conflicts of interest with the Creditors' Committee Attorney Steven Hedberg and Seemingly with Sussman Shank.
Kevin Padrick was under contract with the Debtor to give them financial advice, as noted in the Sussman Shank, Susan Ford Press Release, which makes him an "insider" right legally? This makes him NOT a "disinterested party" RIGHT?
Then, after this, he was "appointed" as Trustee by a Federal Bankruptcy Judge, Judge Randall Dunn, after Sussman Shank Attorney Susan Ford Advised that this is NOT in the Best Interest of the Creditors, Judge Randall Dunn Suggested the Kevin Padrick be appointed as the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy and Sussman Shank made no objection to this, what seemsto be a serious conflict of interest, Why?
Also note that Tonkon Torp was making Tons of money and as this quote says "Kevin knew he could get Leon Simson on board and therefore, possibly Pamela Griffith."
Source of Quote -
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=1628
~ Pamela Griffith is the Department of Justice U.S. Trustee that was supposed to watch over the actions of the Trustee (Kevin Padrick) and in my opinion she was conflicted as she used to work with Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Tonkon Torp Leon Simson and Tonkon Torp David Aman stood to make a whole lot of money from Kevin Padrick being the Trustee in the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy.
Lot's Of Questions and Seemingly No One in a Position of Authority to Ask them To.
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger believe that the law states that as someone with knowledge of a crime, or possible crime, you can file a Criminal Complaint, and Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger intends to file Judicial Complaints, Attorney Complaints, Department of Justice Complaints, and a Federal RICO Lawsuit over the actions of Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group in the Summit Bankruptcy Case.
And as those cases are filed, Blogger Crystal Cox will post them on her Investigative Blogger Network and expose all the government agencies that once again ignore corruption in the US Bankruptcy Courts and aid and abet the corruption in the US Courts by refusing to investigate what whistle blowers tell them.
It’s Time for Accountability and Transparency in the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts.
The Debtors Financial Adviser becomes the Trustee working against the Debtor?
Does No One See an Issue with this???
And this Man, Kevin Padrick has a History of taking advantage of his own clients
and is seemingly accountable to no one.
In the news articles on the Summit Indictments you see this quote, “We will vigorously
investigate and prosecute anyone, especially licensed professionals, who cheat others to
enrich themselves,” said U.S. Attorney Holton.”
The thing is the Oregon Governor, the Attorney General, the SEC, the FBI, and all who govern white collar crimes and the US Bankruptcy Courts, they all seem to flat out ignore the activities of the Judges, Attorneys, DOJ Trustee and Bankruptcy Trustee after the money is turned over to the US Bankruptcy system and pilfered by the insiders, as the Creditors, Investors, Victims are at the mercy of the Bankruptcy Judge and the Trustee of which there is no real oversight and absolutely no transparency or accountability for their actions, their outrageous fees and their behind the scenes back scratching and favors owed, all at the expense of those with their whole lives wrapped up in the outcome of the bankruptcy.
This Summit case was allegedly being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Investigation Division of the Internal Revenue Service, the United States Postal Inspectors, and the Oregon Division of Finance and Corporate Securities. Assistant U.S. Attorney Seth Uram and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Helen Cooper, as part of a partnership venture between the Seattle Region, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney’s Office in Portland, Oregon.
The thing is they all turned a blind eye to inside documents and proof as to what the Trustee was doing, and to this day have simply pointed the finger at the Debtor and have not even questioned where the money went after Obsidian Finance Group stepped onto the Scene, which was BEFORE the Debtor Filed for Bankruptcy.
The Summit Bankruptcy was riddled with conflicts of interest. The Summit Bankruptcy and all
activities involving anything that Kevin Padrick did as the Trustee, should be null and void.
The Summit Indictments should be re-investigated as one man used powerful connections to ensure those indictment and to keep the eyes off him while he raked in million upon millions, and future favors galore, Kevin Padrick Bankruptcy Trustee did NOT offer the “Highest Fiduciary Duty” Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox is dedicated to exposing Kevin Padrick and Obsidian
Finance Group, as she believe they have created a trail of victims, of which she believes she
fights for by using the power of Internet marketing to get top search engine placement and
get these victims, these creditors and investors that are at the mercy of a corrupt and nontransparent
bankruptcy court system, found in the search engines in hopes of getting them justice and providing transparency and accountability where there is none.
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Kevin Padrick was under contract with the Debtor in the Summit Bankruptcy, then Was appointed Trustee, is this Legal?
Can a Department of Justice, Court Appointed Trustee be a Legally Defined Insider?
Stephanie DeYoung, Mark Knowles, Jim Hull filed an Objection to these Outrageous Fees, and serial Plaintiff Kevin Padrick put them under so much duress they gave up, and though not based in law or bankruptcy code, Kevin Padrick, with his attorney David Aman ... well he got his way. The Objection went away, yet Kevin Padrick was called out again in the Homestreet / Cascadia Project LLC legal battle where Homestreet bank objected to Kevin Padrick's fees and conflicts of interest. Homestreet WON, where bankruptcy whistleblower and mother of 3 Stephanie DeYoung was forced to stand down, though their Objection to the Fees was thorough, truthful and was a legitimate objection.
This talks about investigations into debtors debt, see Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group already had this information in Great Detail, as he was an Insider, under contract, under "control" of the Debtors, yet he became Trustee and SEEMED to charge the estate to investigate what he was already paid to look into by the Summit Principals, his Client.
This is for the Courts to Decide and to Look at But I Certainly Do Raise the Question:
Also Note that Sussman Shank, Attorney for the Summit Principals did not object and seemed in fact to agree with Judge Dunn in appointing Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance when it looks like days before THIS SAME Attorney, Sussman Shank's Lead Attorney Susan Ford said in an email to Steven Hedberg of Perkins Coie (Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee who at one time worked under Kevin Padrick at Miller Nash), to Tom Stilley (Assistant Attorney for Sussman and Shank), to Jeanette Thomas ( Perkins Coie Attorney for Creditors' Committee), and to Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group that """There was significant concern that such a proposal would be "dead on arrival" and might even lead to a Motion by the UST to appoint a Trustee, which would not benefit the creditors.""
Click Here for a link to that email.
So what happened, who is liable, where is the highest fiduciary duty ?
They ALL, surely seemed to know that Kevin Padrick Was Legally Defined in Bankruptcy Code as an Insider and yet they all looked the other way, why? And if it is not illegal then certainly Kevin Padrick should be filed against with the Oregon State Bar as an Ethics Violation, at the least, Right?
The Summit case involves victims (Creditors and Investors) in multiple states, who is really liable? Accountable? I would say to start with, the Victims need to sue the Department of Justice and those personally involved in the oversight duties of the Summit Bankruptcy in which Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was allegedly to answer to.
Did Kevin Patrick's past connection with Miller Nash and Working with Steve Hedberg there present a Legal Conflict of Interest in the Summit Bankruptc as Kevin Padrick being appointed by Judge Dunn to be the Trustee? Why did Sussman Shank agree to this appointment, when days before Lead Attorney Susan Ford of Sussman Shank flat out said that this was not in the best interest of the Creditors?
Why did Kevin Padrick bill the Summit Creditors for a meeting with Steve Hedberg, Perkins Coie (Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee who at one time worked under Kevin Padrick at Miller Nash), and Tom Stilley (Assistant Attorney for Sussman and Shank) to discuss replacing Terry Vance as CRO? This can be seen discussed in Judicial Proceeding Case No. 08-37031 rld11 in Billable Hours.
Terry Vance was doing a fine job, from all I have read and Susan Ford Lead Attorney with Sussman Shank was allegedly out of town when Tom Stilley, Sussman Shank was involved in this. So, was Tom Stilley Connected in any Conflict of Interest Ways?
Why did Sussman Shank agree, knowing full well that Kevin Padrick was Legally Defined as an Insider by way of Contract with the Summit Principals to work for them?
Didn't Susan Ford, Sussman Shank talk about Obsidian being "retained" in this Press Release
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/summitwebsiteannouncement.pdf
Therefore Susan Ford of Sussman Shank knew full well that in Bankruptcy Code Kevin Padrick was Defined Legally as an Insider.
So why did Sussman Shank NOT object to Judge Randall Dunn appointing Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group as the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy ? Why did the courts appoint a trustee based on an oral motion without any prior notice to parties in interest? Why was an individual, Kevin Padrick appointed as a United States Trustee? Certainly all these questions are of Public Concern?
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, Summit 1031 Bankruptcy Trustee had past close working connections with Steve Hedberg, Perkins Coie who in the Summit Bankruptcy was / is Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee. Steven Hedberg, it is my understanding at one time worked under Kevin Padrick when they were both at Miller Nash Law Firm.
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, Summit 1031 Bankruptcy Trustee also seems to have past affiliations with the founder of Sussman Shank, as shown here http://www.sussmanshank.com/gtruths.asp . Yes represented against as with Miller Nash, thing is there is certainly reason to question a Conflict of Interest, a History with Sussman Shank in some way and YET again, in My Opinion, had no legal right to be appointed as Trustee and if so, certainly no Ethical Reason, Right?
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, seems to me to be a seriously conflicted Bankruptcy Trustee as he was an insider, legally defined, I believe, and had conflicts of interest with the Creditors' Committee Attorney Steven Hedberg and Seemingly with Sussman Shank.
Kevin Padrick was under contract with the Debtor to give them financial advice, as noted in the Sussman Shank, Susan Ford Press Release, which makes him an "insider" right legally? This makes him NOT a "disinterested party" RIGHT?
Then, after this, he was "appointed" as Trustee by a Federal Bankruptcy Judge, Judge Randall Dunn, after Sussman Shank Attorney Susan Ford Advised that this is NOT in the Best Interest of the Creditors. And Sussman Shank made no objection to this, what seems to me to be a serious conflict of interest, Why?
Also note that Tonkon Torp was making Tons of money and as this quote says "Kevin knew he could get Leon Simson on board and therefore, possibly Pamela Griffith." Source of Quote - http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=1628 ~ Pamela Griffith is the Department of Justice U.S. Trustee that was supposed to watch over the actions of the Trustee (Kevin Padrick) and in my opinion she was conflicted as she used to work with Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Tonkon Torp Leon Simson and Tonkon Torp David Aman stood to make a whole lot of money from Kevin Padrick being the Trustee in the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy.
Lot's Of Questions and Seemingly No One in a Position of Authority to Ask them To.
I believe that the law states that as someone with knowledge of a crime, or possible crime, you can file a Criminal Complaint, more on that Soon, if I can I will be filing Criminal Complaints and Stating the Codes Violated and why I believe it to be so.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_11_00001106----000-.html
http://www.chapter11trustee.com/2011/01/possible-bankruptcy-code-violations-in.html
http://www.bankruptcyaction.com/bankruptcydictionary.htm
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_11_00001106----000-.html
Here are research links to More on the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy, Kevin Padrick, David, Aman, Tonkon Torp, Perkins Coie, Judge Randall Dunny, Steven Hedberg.
My Blog on Obsidian Finance Group
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/
Stephanie DeYoung Summit Bankruptcy Whistle Blower Blog, NOT Mine
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/
Documents I gave the courts to prove the source of the post
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2011/12/in-obsidian-v-cox-i-provided.html
Here is Exhibit 520 that I gave Judge Marco Hernandez, Portland Oregon
Obsidian V. Cox Trial Transcripts
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117800653/Obsidian-V-Cox-Trial-Transcripts
Meeting Videos
http://www.youtube.com/user/KevinPadrick
Court Filing Against Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/98076240/David-Aman-Tonkon-Torp-for-Obsidian-Finance-Group-Trustee-Kevin-Padrick
Posted Here Proudly
by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox has Some Questions for the FBI, the Department of Justice and anyone out there who actually provides any kind of Monitoring of the Bankruptcy Courts or in any way Enforces the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.I Believe the Summit Creditor, Investors and Even Summit Principals can file a class action lawsuit against Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, David Brown, Pamela Griffith and the Department of Justice, Judge Randal Dunn, the Bend DA Office, Perkins Coie, Sussman Shank, Susan Ford, Steven Hedberg, Annie Buell, the Tennant Family, Tonkon Torp, David Aman and Leon Simpson ~ As I believe they all acted in conspiracy to get Kevin Padrick the Trustee job and to divert the DOJ and FBI to focus on the Summit Principals while Kevin Padrick ran away with everyone's money.
Certainly Judge Dunn, the Bankruptcy Judge in this case, knew that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was under contract with Obsidian to Advise them - there were press releases from Sussman Shank Attorney Susan Ford that discussed Obsidian being on board, the attorneys of the Principals knew that "Obsidian" was on board as you see in the transcription of the meeting BEFORE Kevin Padrick showed up to that Summit Meeting. Is Judge Dunn Liable ? Will the Oregon Tax Payers end up paying a huge settlement when possibly the Summit Creditors Sue Judge Dunn Personally and Professionally?
Why did a Federal Bankruptcy Judge appoint what looks to me like a legally defined "Insider" as a Trustee" ? Was Kevin Padrick an "Insider" and "Interested" party by law and therefore NOT Legally Qualified to be the Trustee of the Summit Bankruptcy?Did the Department of Justice Trustee, Judge Randall Dunn, Steven Hedberg of Perkins Coie and Tom Stilley of Sussman Shank act in conspiracy to get Kevin Padrick this very lucrative Trustee job? And if so, well then who was the real "Oversight" to provide any kind of transparency and accountability for the Investors and Creditors? Where was the Department Of Justice in making sure that Kevin Padrick was providing a service that was of the "Highest Fiduciary Duty"?
The actions of the DOJ, the Bankruptcy Judge and the Attorneys for the Creditor and the Debtors makes no legal or ethical sense to me and is certainly not of the highest fiduciary duty. I would say, in my OPINION that Judge Randall Dunn has some serious Explaining to do and possibly some Lawsuits of his own to face.Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group was under contract to assist Summit to form a plan of reorganization and instead drove them further into problems, and took a workable situation financially and basically drowned his own clients ensuring they file bankruptcy and could not reorganize and therefore Kevin Padrick would get massive commissions on each asset SOLD and get HUGE fees for services with No Oversight.
I am not claiming I know Law, thing is Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(31) sure seems to me to be suggesting that as a legally defined Insider, under contract to advise the Debtor, that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was not legally allowed to be "appointed" as the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy, I don't Know this for Fact, I am not a Bankruptcy Attorney. However, I will point you to some links of interest to do your own homework.
Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(31)
"(14) The term "disinterested person" means a person that--
Above Quoted from(A) is not a creditor, an equity security holder, or an insider;(B) is not and was not, within 2 years before the date of the filing of the petition, a director, officer, or employee of the debtor; and(C) does not have an interest materially adverse to the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or equity security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the debtor, or for any other reason.
http://doney.net/bkcode/11usc0101.htm
One thing that jumps out at me is property must be transferred to a "disinterested party" right? And as above in the bankruptcy code we note the definition of "disinterested party" NOT an Insider, and Kevin Padrick was an "Insider" from the way I see it.
Wasn't Kevin Padrick in "control" of the "debtor" and thereby again an insider? He seemed to have advised them on all this BEFORE he was the Trustee working against them, is this Legal? Really? It certainly must be unethically for an Oregon Attorney to provide financial advise to a company, take their personal financial data and use it against them. It must be a "breach of contract" at the very least, right? As Kevin Padrick was under contract with Summit, though at my Trial (Obsidian V. Cox) I asked Kevin Padrick if he had a contract with Summit and he said he did not, of which others at Obsidian later admitted they did have a signed contract, and took $100,000 of Summit's money.
Stephanie DeYoung, Mark Knowles, Jim Hull filed an Objection to these Outrageous Fees, and serial Plaintiff Kevin Padrick put them under so much duress they gave up, and though not based in law or bankruptcy code, Kevin Padrick, with his attorney David Aman ... well he got his way. The Objection went away, yet Kevin Padrick was called out again in the Homestreet / Cascadia Project LLC legal battle where Homestreet bank objected to Kevin Padrick's fees and conflicts of interest. Homestreet WON, where bankruptcy whistleblower and mother of 3 Stephanie DeYoung was forced to stand down, though their Objection to the Fees was thorough, truthful and was a legitimate objection.
See Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group had the debtors books, had spreadsheets on the Debtors Assets and Personal Financial Information and WAS an Insider, it seems to me. Therefore, In my Opinion, He had NO BUSINESS working for the Creditors in this Case nor being appointed as the Trustee, in my Opinion and the way I see the Laws, from my Non-Lawyer interpretation.Bankruptcy Code on Duties of Trustee and Examinerhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_11_00001106----000-.html
the Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(31) ("insiders" include an 6 "officer","person in control of the debtor", "affiliate, or insider of an affiliate as if such affiliate were the debtor", and "managing agent of the debtor").
This talks about investigations into debtors debt, see Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group already had this information in Great Detail, as he was an Insider, under contract, under "control" of the Debtors, yet he became Trustee and SEEMED to charge the estate to investigate what he was already paid to look into by the Summit Principals, his Client.
This is for the Courts to Decide and to Look at But I Certainly Do Raise the Question:
Can a Legally Defined "Insider" of the Debtor be Appointed
as a Trustee in a 40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy Case?
Also Note that Sussman Shank, Attorney for the Summit Principals did not object and seemed in fact to agree with Judge Dunn in appointing Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance when it looks like days before THIS SAME Attorney, Sussman Shank's Lead Attorney Susan Ford said in an email to Steven Hedberg of Perkins Coie (Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee who at one time worked under Kevin Padrick at Miller Nash), to Tom Stilley (Assistant Attorney for Sussman and Shank), to Jeanette Thomas ( Perkins Coie Attorney for Creditors' Committee), and to Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group that """There was significant concern that such a proposal would be "dead on arrival" and might even lead to a Motion by the UST to appoint a Trustee, which would not benefit the creditors.""
Click Here for a link to that email.
So what happened, who is liable, where is the highest fiduciary duty ?
They ALL, surely seemed to know that Kevin Padrick Was Legally Defined in Bankruptcy Code as an Insider and yet they all looked the other way, why? And if it is not illegal then certainly Kevin Padrick should be filed against with the Oregon State Bar as an Ethics Violation, at the least, Right?
The Summit case involves victims (Creditors and Investors) in multiple states, who is really liable? Accountable? I would say to start with, the Victims need to sue the Department of Justice and those personally involved in the oversight duties of the Summit Bankruptcy in which Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was allegedly to answer to.
Also think about this, as thought to consider, it is Tax Code, in a 1031 Exchange that Property, such as
the Assets and LLC's involved in the Summit Bankruptcy that this be transferred to a "Disinterested Party"
which it SEEMS that by Law Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group Was not. So is this a Violation of
Tax Code regarding 1031 Exchanges?
the Assets and LLC's involved in the Summit Bankruptcy that this be transferred to a "Disinterested Party"
which it SEEMS that by Law Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group Was not. So is this a Violation of
Tax Code regarding 1031 Exchanges?
Did Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group retain a "Qualified Intermediary" for the 1031 Exchange
Transactions, seeings how it seems to me that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was NOT
a "disinterested party" as I believe the law states that an intermediary must be ???
Transactions, seeings how it seems to me that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group was NOT
a "disinterested party" as I believe the law states that an intermediary must be ???
Did Kevin Patrick's past connection with Miller Nash and Working with Steve Hedberg there present a Legal Conflict of Interest in the Summit Bankruptc as Kevin Padrick being appointed by Judge Dunn to be the Trustee? Why did Sussman Shank agree to this appointment, when days before Lead Attorney Susan Ford of Sussman Shank flat out said that this was not in the best interest of the Creditors?
Why did Kevin Padrick bill the Summit Creditors for a meeting with Steve Hedberg, Perkins Coie (Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee who at one time worked under Kevin Padrick at Miller Nash), and Tom Stilley (Assistant Attorney for Sussman and Shank) to discuss replacing Terry Vance as CRO? This can be seen discussed in Judicial Proceeding Case No. 08-37031 rld11 in Billable Hours.
Terry Vance was doing a fine job, from all I have read and Susan Ford Lead Attorney with Sussman Shank was allegedly out of town when Tom Stilley, Sussman Shank was involved in this. So, was Tom Stilley Connected in any Conflict of Interest Ways?
Why did Sussman Shank agree, knowing full well that Kevin Padrick was Legally Defined as an Insider by way of Contract with the Summit Principals to work for them?
Didn't Susan Ford, Sussman Shank talk about Obsidian being "retained" in this Press Release
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/summitwebsiteannouncement.pdf
Therefore Susan Ford of Sussman Shank knew full well that in Bankruptcy Code Kevin Padrick was Defined Legally as an Insider.
So why did Sussman Shank NOT object to Judge Randall Dunn appointing Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group as the Trustee in the Summit Bankruptcy ? Why did the courts appoint a trustee based on an oral motion without any prior notice to parties in interest? Why was an individual, Kevin Padrick appointed as a United States Trustee? Certainly all these questions are of Public Concern?
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, Summit 1031 Bankruptcy Trustee had past close working connections with Steve Hedberg, Perkins Coie who in the Summit Bankruptcy was / is Lead Attorney for the Creditors Committee. Steven Hedberg, it is my understanding at one time worked under Kevin Padrick when they were both at Miller Nash Law Firm.
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, Summit 1031 Bankruptcy Trustee also seems to have past affiliations with the founder of Sussman Shank, as shown here http://www.sussmanshank.com/gtruths.asp . Yes represented against as with Miller Nash, thing is there is certainly reason to question a Conflict of Interest, a History with Sussman Shank in some way and YET again, in My Opinion, had no legal right to be appointed as Trustee and if so, certainly no Ethical Reason, Right?
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, seems to me to be a seriously conflicted Bankruptcy Trustee as he was an insider, legally defined, I believe, and had conflicts of interest with the Creditors' Committee Attorney Steven Hedberg and Seemingly with Sussman Shank.
Kevin Padrick was under contract with the Debtor to give them financial advice, as noted in the Sussman Shank, Susan Ford Press Release, which makes him an "insider" right legally? This makes him NOT a "disinterested party" RIGHT?
Then, after this, he was "appointed" as Trustee by a Federal Bankruptcy Judge, Judge Randall Dunn, after Sussman Shank Attorney Susan Ford Advised that this is NOT in the Best Interest of the Creditors. And Sussman Shank made no objection to this, what seems to me to be a serious conflict of interest, Why?
Also note that Tonkon Torp was making Tons of money and as this quote says "Kevin knew he could get Leon Simson on board and therefore, possibly Pamela Griffith." Source of Quote - http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?p=1628 ~ Pamela Griffith is the Department of Justice U.S. Trustee that was supposed to watch over the actions of the Trustee (Kevin Padrick) and in my opinion she was conflicted as she used to work with Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Tonkon Torp Leon Simson and Tonkon Torp David Aman stood to make a whole lot of money from Kevin Padrick being the Trustee in the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy.
Lot's Of Questions and Seemingly No One in a Position of Authority to Ask them To.
I believe that the law states that as someone with knowledge of a crime, or possible crime, you can file a Criminal Complaint, more on that Soon, if I can I will be filing Criminal Complaints and Stating the Codes Violated and why I believe it to be so.
The Debtors Financial Adviser becomes the Trustee working against the Debtor?
Does No One See an Issue with this???
Links and Resources to this Post
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_11_00001106----000-.html
http://www.chapter11trustee.com/2011/01/possible-bankruptcy-code-violations-in.html
http://www.bankruptcyaction.com/bankruptcydictionary.htm
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_11_00001106----000-.html
Here are research links to More on the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy, Kevin Padrick, David, Aman, Tonkon Torp, Perkins Coie, Judge Randall Dunny, Steven Hedberg.
My Blog on Obsidian Finance Group
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/
Stephanie DeYoung Summit Bankruptcy Whistle Blower Blog, NOT Mine
http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/
Documents I gave the courts to prove the source of the post
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2011/12/in-obsidian-v-cox-i-provided.html
Here is Exhibit 520 that I gave Judge Marco Hernandez, Portland Oregon
To Show the Source of the Post I was on Trial For.
Obsidian V. Cox Trial Transcripts
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117800653/Obsidian-V-Cox-Trial-Transcripts
Meeting Videos
http://www.youtube.com/user/KevinPadrick
Court Filing Against Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/98076240/David-Aman-Tonkon-Torp-for-Obsidian-Finance-Group-Trustee-Kevin-Padrick
Posted Here Proudly
by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Pro Se Defendant, Crystal L. Cox Investigative Blogger in Obsidian Vs. Cox, Soon to File Lawsuit Against Tonkon Torp Law Firm
Blogger Crystal L. Cox Soon to File Lawsuit against Law Firm Tonkon Torp Based in Portland Oregon.
In approx. Six Weeks I am Filing a Lawsuit Against Tonkon Torp Law Firm for discrimination, harassment, violating my constitutional rights, denying me due process, interfering with the legal process, harassing me, threatening me, lying to me, lying about me to a federal court in which I have several incidents of proof, conspiring to harass and threaten me in order to force a deal, offering to work a deal with me in where by I would lie to a federal court and commit a crime in claiming the guilt of innocent parties, and in trying to scare, harass and threaten me into stopping my blog postings on Tonkon Torp Law Firm.
.jpg)
Keep in mind the very first "Settlement Communication", Offer to Settle from David Aman, Attorney for the Plaintiff, Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, David Aman tried to cut a deal where by I gave him my Domain Names at the time that were connected to Tonkon Torp Law Firm, and in this deal that was supposed to be on behalf of the "Plaintiff" Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, David Aman tried to get me to agree to never write anything on Tonkon Torp Lawyers or Law Firm EVER, and if I agreed to all that, well then the "Plaintiff" Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group would STOP the 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit. That sure does not sound legal to me, did the Plaintiff really want to PROTECT Tonkon Torp Lawyers and Tonkon Torp Law Firm from EVER being written on by my Investigative Blogger Network? Also keep in mind a Network of Blogs that David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer is still trying his best to claim ownership and control of, whether it is legal or not.All Settlement Communications will be Exhibits in my Lawsuit as will be all emails inside the Summit Bankruptcy to and from Tonkon Torp Lawyers to the best of my ability.
This complaint / lawsuit will have documents of proof that Tonkon Torp was harassing me in order to cover up the involvement of Leon Simson, David Peterson, David Aman and others at Tonkon Torp Law Firm, with the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon and involving at least 5 states, and over 100 victims.
.jpg)
Crystal Cox alleges that Tonkon Torp broke the law and violated U.S. Bankruptcy Codes knowingly. Tonkon Torp Law Firm was involved in the Summit Bankrupty and even deposed an insider to ask about me 2 years before they sued me. Tonkon Torp Law Firm is still deliberately harassing me, Blogger Crystal Cox in order to attempt to cover up the involvement of Tonkon Torp Law Firm with the DOJ Trustee, and the Energy Lobby jobs that Tonkon Torp got after this now infamous Oregon Bankruptcy.
Tonkon Torp Law Firm is involved in fraud, as in David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer lying about an Investigative Blogger in federal documents and attempting to conspire with me to commit fraud. Also David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer was in communications with a man named Sean Boushie in Montana, in which a Federal Judge Called for an FBI investigation. Yet David Aman is still legally allowed to harass and intimidated me, this too will be in my Lawsuit against Tonkon Torp Law Firm.
David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer, lied to a federal court regarding my deposition in Montana in which he did not properly notify me and I was in the hospital with my then significant other, as I told David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer and of which he had no respect what so ever. David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm told the courts that I rejected a Settlement Offer and thereby was not cooperative, this was the first one, and it was a day before I actually rejected the offer.
This lawsuit will also Allege that David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer was involved in Jury Tampering in Obsidian V. Cox. And will provide Exhibits as to why I believe this to be TRUE.
I will soon be posting the draft of this complaint, and an open letter to Tonkon Torp Partners in which I will also email to Tonkon Torp Lawyers, Partners and Insurance Providers regarding this matter and the massive liability that Tonkon Torp's E and O insurance, Liability Insurance Carrier is taking on, over a few lawyers that seem to have violated bankruptcy code knowingly and have spent huge Tonkon Torp resources in trying to silence an Investigative Blogger. And attempting to stop me exposing the involvement of Tonkon Torp in the Summit Bankruptcy and Tonkon Torp connections to the Department of Justice Trustee that was to oversee the Bankruptcy and that Got Tonkon Torp the massive income opportunity in connection with Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.
 |
| Leon Simson Tonkon Torp |
Tonkon Torp sued me, and tried to cut deals in order to suppress information on a $40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy.
 |
| David Peterson Tonkon Torp |
I will "Allege" in this Lawsuit that David Peterson of Tonkon Torp knew of possible bankruptcy code violations in the Summit Bankruptcy and did nothing to bring this to the attention of authorities. As this internal emails that show David Peterson's knowledge of what was being alleged by attorneys and insiders and was IGNORED by Tonkon Torp Attorneys, though Federal Bankruptcy Laws seemed to be being violated and there were over 100 victims.
I will "Allege" in this Lawsuit that Tonkon Torp Conspired with Jim Diegel and Cascade Medical Center to stop information from getting to an Investigative Blogger Me.
I will "Allege" in this Lawsuit that the Summit Bankruptcy connections led to Energy Lobbying for the Tonkon Torp Law Firm in which OpenSecrets.org shows that Tonkon Torp was not previously involved in.
I will "Allege" in this Lawsuit that Tonkon Torp's connection to Enron and thereby Proskauer Rose is also part of a conspiracy to protect corrupt activities surrounding the iViewit Technology Case.
As per SEC Complaints, the Collapse of Enron is directly connected to the iViewit Technology and it's founder Eliot Bernstein, and the Proskauer Rose Law Firm. I allege that Tonkon Torp is harassing me to Protect the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology and now in Tonkon Torp Involving Eliot Bernstein and iViewit Technologies in Obsidian V. Cox, this is to suppress my blogs regarding the exposing of whitewashing for Elite New York Law Firms connected to the Case as exposed by Whistle Blower Christine Anderson out of New York. Tonkon Torp Lawyer David Aman is harassing, bullying Blogger Crystal Cox who is exposing this 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft. Tonkon Torp Lawyer David Aman is harassing iViewit Founder Eliot Bernstein in effort to silence blogs by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox that Expose the involvement of Enron, Proskauer Rose in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology.
Tonkon Torp Lawyer David Aman is trying to control blogs in which are named in Federal RICO Lawsuits, USPTO Complaints, Department of Justice and FBI Complaints, New York Supreme Court Filings and many more legal documents so that he can control the information on the domain names to stop the blogs from exposing criminal activity in the iViewit Technology case, the Summit Bankruptcy and the hundreds of other criminal conspiracies that Blogger Crystal Cox exposes.
Tonkon Torp Lawyer David Aman is doing this to protect the involvement of Tonkon Torp Law Firm in WHAT blogger Crystal Cox is exposing on her Investigative Blog Network.
I am also working on a Federal Hate Crime Filing (Bullied, Harassed, Biased Motivated), a Federal RICO Complaint, and Bar Complaints in several states in which Tonkon Torp Law Firm Does Business. As well as filing a Qui Tam (Whistle Blower Lawsuit) regarding Energy Lobbying, A Federal Bankruptcy and more regarding Tonkon Torp Law Firm and money they have got due to government proceedings and alleged dirty dealings. I will also be filing complaints with document of proof to the Oregon Attorney General and Oregon Governor. As I was always telling the truth to the best of my knowledge and ability and I continue to do so.
.jpg)
David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney has harassed Pro Se Defendant, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox for well over a year now. And David S. Aman seems to be above the Law, however, I intend to put that to the test as I file yet another legal proceeding with Tonkon Torp. See David Aman lied to Forbes Magazine, the New York Times, and Seattle Weekly about me and accusing me of criminal conduct. I have the Email he send to the Seattle Weekly defaming me, accusing me of a crime. David Aman, Intellectual Property Attorney for Tonkon Torp Law Firm out of Portland Oregon did this Knowingly and Deliberate in attempt to set me up and STOP the flow of information regarding the involvement of Tonkon Torp Lawyers in the Summit Bankruptcy Case and with Obsidian Finance Group and Energy Lobbying in General.
All this will Be in my complaint against Tonkon Torp Law Firm and if Portland Oregon Courts protect Tonkon Torp I will take it to a higher court. The Federal Hate Crime and the RICO Complaint / Lawsuit will automatically put this in a higher court.
David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer has Subpoenaed my banks, went over every detail of my life, and completely violated my human and civil rights, knowing full well that Oregon Retraction Laws did apply to me, knowing that I was telling the Truth and knowing full well I have every right to blog on Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group. David Aman, Portland Oregon Law, Continues to Harass me, Pro Se Defendant, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.
My counter claim was dismissed by Oregon Federal Courts which alleged similar activities by and with Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group.
Note: Many of you are emailing me about domain names I write on and asking if the Plaintiff is Taking the Domain Names. Folks, if they do, just email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, and I will tell you the story. It is Illegal for Tonkon Torp to do many of the things they have done to me over a year, and I shall meet Tonkon Torp Law Firm in Court over this. I am sure that the Corrupt, Lying David Aman who has lied about me at every turn in this case will control my blogs soon, and in that I will sue Tonkon Torp for even more.
This case WILL be overturned, as it is unjust, unlawful, unconstitutional.
David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer is deposing me Crystal Blogger on Thursday to discuss my alleged assets, to further harass me and to question me over my business and the domain names I use to make a living. David Aman has lied since the beginning of this lawsuit filing and I do not expect this deposition to be any different.
If David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer takes the domain names I used to make a living then so be it, this case will be over turned and he will have to give them back, I am not worried about this. I make a living from those names in conjunction with other people, and if David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer takes my livelihood, which is illegal then that is just one more thing that Tonkon Torp Law Firm will be liable for.
David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer will soon be asked to answer many questions by way of a Declarative Statement from me, in a Legal Battle whereby Tonkon Torp Law Firm and David Aman personally, will be a Defendant. David Aman and the Tonkon Torp Law Firm was involved in the Corruption I was exposing as an Internet Journalist and they continue to harass me to silence the truth. I will continue to file legal documents to prove that Tonkon Torp has done this to me in order to harass me into silence.
David Aman, Tonkon Torp is breaking the law, he is privileged to do so with his law degree, not much I can do about it. I am not breaking the law, nor have I. David Aman will be accountable one day to a non-corrupt court. This law degree also gives David Aman to get all my bank records without even having to show my bank an actual "judgement". David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer abuses his power and I will sue him for infringing on my legal rights to due process and constitutional law.
 |
| Tonkon Torp Law Firm |
It will all come out that Obsidian Finance Group actually made business deals that show higher revenue deals and was simply trying to silence me to cover up the truth about Obsidian Finance Group, as I linked to documented proof, it was all to silence me and this will come out, lawsuit after lawsuits. David Aman can harass me, bully me, commit fraud and criminal acts against me, and still one day the TRUTH will come out.
Even if David Aman soon takes my access to domain names and thereby STOPS my ability to "edit" or make changes on those sites, and there by takes my income, I will still expose David Aman and the Tonkon Torp Law Firm for their involvement in all this. I will so via Press Releases, Legal Documents, Tons of Free Blogs, ebooks, PDF Documents, YouTube Videos, books registered with Bowker as I have lots of ISBN numbers registered to me as Nakaii Publishing. I Will find a Way to Expose them.
Justice Will Prevail Eventually
Let Go, Let God !!!
Also please Note:
Though I have complete faith that all will be as it should be, still I do believe that David Aman is capable of anything and if I should not return to this blog after my Deposition, well then assume the worse, as David Aman has been harassing and threatening me for over a year and the courts have protected him, thus far to do so with Free Reign. Also note I have a large fan base, and other bloggers who will continue exposing David Aman, Kevin Padrick and Tonkon Torp Lawyers in the event of my Death. I hope you, Reader will continue investigating Tonkon Torp, David Aman and Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick, Patricia Whittington, and David Brown. For they are not above killing me, I have known this for over a year. So Again, Let Go, Let God.
Research Links on Federal Hate Crimes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime_laws_in_the_United_States
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/hate_crimes
http://www.ncjw.org/media/PDFs/rsrcehatecrimestpsfaq0509.pdf
http://www.againsthate.pdx.edu/about.htm
http://www.doj.state.or.us/hate_crime_report.shtml
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)